Analisis Penggunaan Augmented Reality Terhadap Fitur SkinTest dan Face Analysis Pada Lemon8 Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/shift.v6i1.224Keywords:
Augmented Reality, Face Analysis, System Usability Scale (SUS), , Skintest, UsabilityAbstract
The development of Augmented Reality (AR) technology in the beauty industry has driven innovations in self-service skin and facial analysis. One of its applications can be found in the SkinTest and Face Analysis features of the Lemon8 application, which enable users to obtain real-time information about their skin condition and facial proportions. This research was conducted using a quantitative approach through the distribution of a SUS questionnaire to respondents aged 18–30 years who had previously used these features, employing purposive sampling techniques. The analysis focused on aspects such as ease of use, interface comfort, and overall user satisfaction. The test results showed that the usability of the SkinTest and Face Analysis features in the Lemon8 application achieved a final score of 59.9. In the Acceptability Range assessment, this score fell into the “Low Marginal” category (low or requires improvement), the Grade Scale indicated a Grade F, and the Adjective Rating placed it in the “Fair” category. These results suggest that most respondents felt the features required improvements to be better accepted by users. The evaluation provides an overview of user perceptions regarding the quality of AR features in Lemon8 and serves as a reference for developers to enhance the user experience and refine the feature design to better meet user needs.
Downloads
References
[1] A. Fathur Rojib and D. Ratnawati, “Pengembangan Augmented Reality (AR) Untuk Mata Pelajaran Teknologi Informasi Kelas X (Studi Kasus MA DARUSSALAM),” Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika, vol. 7, no. 6, Dec. 2023.
[2] Sufiatmi, D. Astriani, and F. Noor, “The Use Of Augmented Reality In a Virtual Make-Up Tri-al Application,” e-Proceeding of Applied Science, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 4078, Dec. 2020.
[3] E. Kurniawan, A. Nata, and S. Royal, “Penerapan System Usability Scale (SUS) Dalam Pen-gukuran Kebergunaan Website Program Studi Di STMIK ROYAL,” Journal of Science and Social Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–49, Feb. 2022, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.goretanpena.com/index.php/JSSR
[4] I. Nurhayati, A. Alfatia, N. Ayu, S. Ananda, Z. Firdaus, and N. A. Rossa, “Penerapan Teknolo-gi dalam Dunia Makeup: Inovasi dan Dampaknya terhadap Konsumen,” Jurnal Multidi-siplin Ilmu Akademik, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 347–356, 2025, doi: 10.61722/jmia.v2i2.4365.
[5] S. Parman, R. Fahrudin, M. A. Lesmana, P. Satrio, and R. Putra, “Penggunaan Teknologi Augmented Reality Untuk Meningkatkan Pengalaman Pelanggan Dalam Pemasaran Produk Real Estate,” vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 179–190, Oct. 2023.
[6] I. Putu et al., “Evaluasi Usability Aplikasi MyTelkomsel Menggunakan Metode System Usa-bility Scale (SUS) Usability Evaluation of The MyTelkomsel Application Using the System Usability Scale (SUS) Method,” Journal of Computer Engineering, System and Science, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 80–93, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.24114/cess.v7i1.
[7] M. Lulu, L. Usman, and A. Gustalika, “Pengujian Validitas dan Reliabilitas System Usability Scale (SUS) Untuk Perangkat Smartphone,” Jurnal ECOTIPE, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 19–24, Apr. 2022.
[8] S. Zanariyah, “Teknik Observasi yang Efektif Pada Kegiatan Kuliah Kerja Nyata (KKN),” Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–4, 2024.
[9] D. Irawan and A. D. Mutmainah, “Peran Pendidikan Agama Islam Dalam Membentuk Kepribadian Yang Mulia,” SYMFONIA Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, vol. 2, no. 2, Dec. 2022.
[10] E. Septiady, “Mengenal Kuesioner Penelitian: Cara Membuat dan Contoh Terbaik,” tSur-veyid. Accessed: May 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://tsurvey.id/portal/mengenal-kuesioner-penelitian-cara-membuat-dan-contoh-terbaik
[11] E. Rosita, W. Hidayat, and W. Yuliani, “Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Perilaku Propososial,” FOKUS (Kajian Bimbingan & Konseling dalam Pendidikan), vol. 4, no. 4, p. 279, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.22460/fokus.v4i4.7413.
[12] B. J. Forester, A. Idris, A. Khater, M. W. Afgani, and M. Isnaini, “Penelitian Kuantitatif: Uji Reliabilitas,” Edu Society: Jurnal Pendidikan, Ilmu Sosial, dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1812–1820, 2024.
[13] H. Hamdani and H. Sa’diyah, “Konsep Dasar Penyusunan Hipotesis dan Kajian Teori dalam Penelitian,” Journal of Linguistics and Social Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 64–73, May 2025, doi: 10.52620/jls.v2i2.93.
[14] B. Antoro, “Analisis Penerapan Formula Slovin Dalam Penelitian Ilmiah: Kelebihan, Kelemahan, Dan Kesalahan Dalam Perspektif Statistik,” Jurnal Multidisiplin Sosial Hu-maniora, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 53–63, Oct. 2024, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.ananpublisher.com/index.php/jmsh
[15] E. Azhari, L. M. Saleh, M. Marantika, J. T. Sipil, and P. N. Ambon, “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Keterlambatan Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Labolatorium Terpadu Dan Perpustakaan MAN 1 MALUKU Tengah,” JOURNAL AGREGATE, vol. 2, no. 2, 2023.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arfi Hafidzati Hudaniah, Muhammad Muharrom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
